Writing Logo  Growing Pains: The Emerging Aesthetics of Emily Carr

The discussion of Emily Carr's Growing Pains was written by Greg Dixon during studies of Canadian Literature. As with all literary analysis, you are encouraged to read the original before reading the commentary.  


While the last chapters of Growing Pains contain focused discussions of Carr's growing aesthetic of Art, direct discussion of aesthetics is rare in the rest of the work. The young Emily Carr has an inner drive to paint, but has little interest in formal analysis. Yet the events chronicled by the mature Carr reveal a developing artistic sensibility. Through repeated contrasts of living things versus dead things, imitation versus authentic expression, and inner essence versus exterior appearances, Carr retraces her long and often painful journey towards an Art form capable of expressing the essential nature of the Western forest.

The child Carr is presented as a loner who intuitively seeks refuge in the forests and lily fields near her family home. Perhaps the earliest statement of the importance of the forest to Carr's artistic work comes in the description of wandering into the forest on the family pony:

This natural affinity for living nature is expressed over and over throughout Growing Pains, often in the form of recurring descriptions. Living things are often contrasted with dead things: wild lilies (p. 8) versus "decaying vegetables" (p. 18) of still-life studies in San Francisco; Antique Class versus Life Class (pp. 99-101); Spring in the English countryside versus the "money-grabbing" and grimy London (p. 137). One of my favourite passages is Carr's reaction to the mummy-room, with "all the solemnity choked out of death", and her shocking declaration to Aunt Amelia and Miss Green:

To Carr, organic recycling into the living earth is much preferred to the "disinfected" death of Egyptian mummies.

The live model in the Life Class provides a more positive example of living as Carr is able to overcome her inbred prudishness to experience the truth explained to her in San Francisco (pp. 30-31) of the difference between nude and naked:

Carr finds little else that is living in the galleries and studios of London. She finds the English approach to Art overly concerned with the reproduction of lifeless antiquities:

The theme of imitation versus original expression appears often, with one of the examples applied to Carr herself; she is disgusted with herself for "prostituting Indian Art" (p. 231) by applying the Indian designs to her pottery. She is even more disgusted by the opportunistic potters who followed her example:

Chaatl, Haida GwaiiThe Indian way of portraying nature had helped Carr to find an appropriate form for capturing the spiritual essence of the Western forests:

Yet Carr needed to reach beyond imitation towards a truly unique expression of nature in her Art, as Lawren Harris advises: "Put aside the Indian motifs, strike out for yourself, Emily, inventing, creating, clothing ideas born of this West, ideas that you feel deep rooted in your heart." (p. 264)

Harris also guides Carr towards abstraction:

While Carr says she was "not ready for abstraction" (p. 260), she comes to see the inner truth of a forest in her dream of greenery:

Just as Carr had glimpsed the living beauty of the nude model, she perceived the vital, living essence beneath the superficial details of the forest in her dream. It is this vital essence that she captures in the best of her Art and expresses in her uniquely personal, spiritual, somewhat abstract Art. If any formal aesthetic of Art can be ascribed to the work of Emily Carr on the basis of Growing Pains, it is that her Art strives to express the living beauty and spiritual essence of her wild Western forests.

[A bibligraphical note is pending]


Greg Dixon: Writings | Exploring Literature | gdixon@shared-visions.com
Copyright © 1999 Shared Visions Unlimited and  Greg Dixon
All rights reserved